Autodeal Car Comparison
GWM Tank 300 2.0L AT vs. Ford Ranger Raptor 2.0 Bi-Turbo 4x4 AT
Ford Ranger Raptor 2.0 Bi-Turbo 4x4 AT is the cheapest
Engine Size
2.0 L
2.0 L
1,998 cc
1,996 cc
4
4
16
16
ZF 8-Speed Automatic Transmission
4x4 10-Speed Automatic Transmission with E-shifter
GWM Tank 300 2.0L AT and Ford Ranger Raptor 2.0 Bi-Turbo 4x4 AT have the same engine sizes
GWM Tank 300 2.0L AT is more powerful
Ford Ranger Raptor 2.0 Bi-Turbo 4x4 AT has more pulling power />
Gasoline
Diesel
Euro 5
Euro 4
75 L
80 L
Ford Ranger Raptor 2.0 Bi-Turbo 4x4 AT is more fuel efficient
*brand manufacturer claim
*Autodeal Review
4,760 mm
5,381 mm
1,930 mm
2,028 mm
1,903 mm
1,922 mm
2,750 mm
3,270 mm
12 m
13 m
224 mm
272 mm
400 L
1,231 L
5
4
5
5
Ford Ranger Raptor 2.0 Bi-Turbo 4x4 AT is longer
Ford Ranger Raptor 2.0 Bi-Turbo 4x4 AT is wider
Ford Ranger Raptor 2.0 Bi-Turbo 4x4 AT is taller
Ford Ranger Raptor 2.0 Bi-Turbo 4x4 AT has a large wheelbase
Ford Ranger Raptor 2.0 Bi-Turbo 4x4 AT has a longer deck
Ford Ranger Raptor 2.0 Bi-Turbo 4x4 AT has a wider deck
Ford Ranger Raptor 2.0 Bi-Turbo 4x4 AT has a taller deck
Ford Ranger Raptor 2.0 Bi-Turbo 4x4 AT has a larger payload capacity
GWM Tank 300 2.0L AT has a tighter turning circle
Ford Ranger Raptor 2.0 Bi-Turbo 4x4 AT has a larger trunk capacity
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
17 in
17 in
Dual-Zone Automatic Air Conditioning
Dual-Zone Electronic Automatic Temperature Control Air-Conditioning
12.3 Full Color Touch Screen
12-inch Colored Portrait Touchscreen Central Display via 6-speakers
7 Years(200,000KM)
5 Years (150,000 km)
n/a
Rock crawl, Sand, Mud/Ruts, and Baja
Important: AutoDeal.com.ph aims to provide the most accurate and updated vehicle information as possible. However, please note that vehicle specifications, prices, and images may be changed by the manufacturers and dealerships without prior notice. If you spot a potential mistake, feel free to contact us at info@autodeal.com.ph.