Autodeal Car Comparison
Mazda BT-50 3.2 4x4 AT vs. Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo Sport 4x4 AT
Mazda BT-50 3.2 4x4 AT is the cheapest
Engine Size
3.2 L
2.0 L
3,198 cc
1,996 cc
5
4
20
16
6-Speed Automatic
6-Speed automatic
Mazda BT-50 3.2 4x4 AT has a bigger engine
Mazda BT-50 3.2 4x4 AT is more powerful
Mazda BT-50 3.2 4x4 AT has more pulling power />
Diesel
Diesel
n/a
Euro 4
80 L
80 L
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo Sport 4x4 AT is more fuel efficient
*brand manufacturer claim
*Autodeal Review
5,365 mm
5,370 mm
1,850 mm
1,918 mm
1,821 mm
1,884 mm
3,220 mm
3,270 mm
1,549 mm
1,564 mm
1,560 mm
1,584 mm
513 mm
540 mm
n/a
985 kg
24 m
13 m
237 mm
235 mm
4
4
5
5
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo Sport 4x4 AT is longer
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo Sport 4x4 AT is wider
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo Sport 4x4 AT is taller
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo Sport 4x4 AT has a large wheelbase
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo Sport 4x4 AT has a longer deck
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo Sport 4x4 AT has a wider deck
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo Sport 4x4 AT has a taller deck
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo Sport 4x4 AT has a larger payload capacity
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo Sport 4x4 AT has a tighter turning circle
1
1
1
1
2
2
with Electronic Brake Force Distribution, Brake Assist, and Dynamic Stability Control, and Hill Descent Control
With Electronic Brake Force Distribution
17 in
18 in
Electronic Automatic Dual Zone
Single-Zone Manual Air Temperature Control
Multifunction Display with USB, Aux-in, and Bluetooth Voice Control via 6 speakers
10" Colored Portrait Touchscreen
3 Years (100,000 km)
5 Years (150,000 km)
n/a
Normal, Eco, Slippery, Tow / Haul
Important: AutoDeal.com.ph aims to provide the most accurate and updated vehicle information as possible. However, please note that vehicle specifications, prices, and images may be changed by the manufacturers and dealerships without prior notice. If you spot a potential mistake, feel free to contact us at info@autodeal.com.ph.