Autodeal Car Comparison
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo XLS 4x2 AT vs. Mazda BT-50 3.0L AT 4x2
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo XLS 4x2 AT is the cheapest
Engine Size
2.0 L
3.0 L
1,996 cc
2,999 cc
4
4
16
16
6-Speed automatic
6-Speed Automatic
Mazda BT-50 3.0L AT 4x2 has a bigger engine
Mazda BT-50 3.0L AT 4x2 is more powerful
Mazda BT-50 3.0L AT 4x2 has more pulling power />
Mazda BT-50 3.0L AT 4x2 accelerates more quickly
Diesel
Diesel
n/a
Euro 4
80 L
76 L
Mazda BT-50 3.0L AT 4x2 is more eco-friendly
Mazda BT-50 3.0L AT 4x2 is more fuel efficient
*brand manufacturer claim
5,370 mm
5,280 mm
1,918 mm
1,870 mm
1,884 mm
1,785 mm
3,270 mm
3,125 mm
1,564 mm
1,571 mm
1,584 mm
1,530 mm
540 mm
490 mm
n/a
800 kg
n/a
13 m
235 mm
235 mm
4
4
5
5
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo XLS 4x2 AT is longer
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo XLS 4x2 AT is wider
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo XLS 4x2 AT is taller
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo XLS 4x2 AT has a large wheelbase
Mazda BT-50 3.0L AT 4x2 has a longer deck
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo XLS 4x2 AT has a wider deck
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo XLS 4x2 AT has a taller deck
Mazda BT-50 3.0L AT 4x2 has a larger payload capacity
Mazda BT-50 3.0L AT 4x2 has a tighter turning circle
1
1
1
1
2
2
16 in
17 in
Single-Zone Manual Air Temperature Control
Single-Zone, Manual with Rear Vents
10" Colored Portrait Touchscreen
7.0-inch LCD Touchscreen with 6 Speakers
5 Years (150,000 km)
3 Years or 100,000 km + 5 Years Free Service Plan
n/a
n/a
Important: AutoDeal.com.ph aims to provide the most accurate and updated vehicle information as possible. However, please note that vehicle specifications, prices, and images may be changed by the manufacturers and dealerships without prior notice. If you spot a potential mistake, feel free to contact us at info@autodeal.com.ph.