Autodeal Car Comparison
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo XLS 4x2 AT vs. Mitsubishi Triton 2.4 GL 4x2 MT
Mitsubishi Triton 2.4 GL 4x2 MT is the cheapest
Engine Size
2.0 L
2.4 L
1,996 cc
2,442 cc
4
4
16
16
6-Speed automatic
6-Speed Manual Transmission
Mitsubishi Triton 2.4 GL 4x2 MT has a bigger engine
Mitsubishi Triton 2.4 GL 4x2 MT is more powerful
Mitsubishi Triton 2.4 GL 4x2 MT has more pulling power />
Diesel
Diesel
n/a
Euro 4
80 L
75 L
Mitsubishi Triton 2.4 GL 4x2 MT is more eco-friendly
Mitsubishi Triton 2.4 GL 4x2 MT is more fuel efficient
*brand manufacturer claim
5,370 mm
5,265 mm
1,918 mm
1,865 mm
1,884 mm
1,775 mm
3,270 mm
3,130 mm
1,564 mm
1,555 mm
1,584 mm
1,545 mm
540 mm
525 mm
n/a
1,095 kg
n/a
12 m
235 mm
203 mm
4
4
5
5
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo XLS 4x2 AT is longer
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo XLS 4x2 AT is wider
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo XLS 4x2 AT is taller
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo XLS 4x2 AT has a large wheelbase
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo XLS 4x2 AT has a longer deck
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo XLS 4x2 AT has a wider deck
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo XLS 4x2 AT has a taller deck
Mitsubishi Triton 2.4 GL 4x2 MT has a larger payload capacity
Mitsubishi Triton 2.4 GL 4x2 MT has a tighter turning circle
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
16 in
16 in
Single-Zone Manual Air Temperature Control
Manual Air Conditioning System
10" Colored Portrait Touchscreen
Integrated Audio System
5 Years (150,000 km)
3 Years (100,000 km)
n/a
n/a
Important: AutoDeal.com.ph aims to provide the most accurate and updated vehicle information as possible. However, please note that vehicle specifications, prices, and images may be changed by the manufacturers and dealerships without prior notice. If you spot a potential mistake, feel free to contact us at info@autodeal.com.ph.