Autodeal Car Comparison
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo XLT 4x2 AT vs. Mitsubishi L300 with FB Body Dual AC
Mitsubishi L300 with FB Body Dual AC is the cheapest
Engine Size
2.0 L
2.2 L
1,996 cc
2,268 cc
4
4
16
16
6-Speed automatic
5-Speed Manual
Mitsubishi L300 with FB Body Dual AC has a bigger engine
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo XLT 4x2 AT is more powerful
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo XLT 4x2 AT has more pulling power />
Diesel
Diesel
Euro 4
Euro 4
80 L
55 L
Mitsubishi L300 with FB Body Dual AC is more eco-friendly
Mitsubishi L300 with FB Body Dual AC is more fuel efficient
*Autodeal Review
*brand manufacturer claim
5,370 mm
4,440 mm
1,918 mm
1,695 mm
1,884 mm
1,915 mm
3,270 mm
2,350 mm
13 m
10 m
235 mm
195 mm
n/a
n/a
4
4
5
17
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo XLT 4x2 AT is longer
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo XLT 4x2 AT is wider
Mitsubishi L300 with FB Body Dual AC is taller
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo XLT 4x2 AT has a large wheelbase
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo XLT 4x2 AT has a longer deck
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo XLT 4x2 AT has a wider deck
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo XLT 4x2 AT has a taller deck
Mitsubishi L300 with FB Body Dual AC has a larger payload capacity
Mitsubishi L300 with FB Body Dual AC has a tighter turning circle
1
1
2
2
17 in
14 in
Single-Zone Manual Air Temperature Control
Dual Air Conditioning w/ Rear Manual Cooling Controls
10" Colored Portrait Touchscreen
Single CD Player with 2 Speakers
5 Years (150,000 km)
3 Years (100,000 km)
n/a
n/a
Important: AutoDeal.com.ph aims to provide the most accurate and updated vehicle information as possible. However, please note that vehicle specifications, prices, and images may be changed by the manufacturers and dealerships without prior notice. If you spot a potential mistake, feel free to contact us at info@autodeal.com.ph.