Autodeal Car Comparison
Ford Ranger 2.2 FX4 4x4 AT vs. Mazda BT-50 3.0L AT 4x2
Mazda BT-50 3.0L AT 4x2 is the cheapest
Engine Size
2.2 L
3.0 L
2,198 cc
2,999 cc
4
4
16
16
6-Speed Automatic Transmission
6-Speed Automatic
Mazda BT-50 3.0L AT 4x2 has a bigger engine
Mazda BT-50 3.0L AT 4x2 is more powerful
Mazda BT-50 3.0L AT 4x2 has more pulling power />
Mazda BT-50 3.0L AT 4x2 accelerates more quickly
Diesel
Diesel
n/a
Euro 4
80 L
76 L
Mazda BT-50 3.0L AT 4x2 is more eco-friendly
Mazda BT-50 3.0L AT 4x2 is more fuel efficient
*brand manufacturer claim
5,354 mm
5,280 mm
1,860 mm
1,870 mm
1,821 mm
1,785 mm
3,220 mm
3,125 mm
1,422 mm
1,571 mm
1,574 mm
1,530 mm
559 mm
490 mm
1,121 kg
800 kg
13 m
13 m
232 mm
235 mm
4
4
5
5
Ford Ranger 2.2 FX4 4x4 AT is longer
Mazda BT-50 3.0L AT 4x2 is wider
Ford Ranger 2.2 FX4 4x4 AT is taller
Ford Ranger 2.2 FX4 4x4 AT has a large wheelbase
Mazda BT-50 3.0L AT 4x2 has a longer deck
Ford Ranger 2.2 FX4 4x4 AT has a wider deck
Ford Ranger 2.2 FX4 4x4 AT has a taller deck
Ford Ranger 2.2 FX4 4x4 AT has a larger payload capacity
Mazda BT-50 3.0L AT 4x2 has a tighter turning circle
1
1
1
1
18 in
17 in
Single-Zone Manual
Single-Zone, Manual with Rear Vents
8-inch LCD Touchscreen via 6 speakers
7.0-inch LCD Touchscreen with 6 Speakers
3 Years (100,000 km)
3 Years or 100,000 km + 5 Years Free Service Plan
n/a
n/a
Important: AutoDeal.com.ph aims to provide the most accurate and updated vehicle information as possible. However, please note that vehicle specifications, prices, and images may be changed by the manufacturers and dealerships without prior notice. If you spot a potential mistake, feel free to contact us at info@autodeal.com.ph.