Autodeal Car Comparison
Mazda BT-50 2.2 4x2 MT vs. Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo XL+ 4x4 MT
Mazda BT-50 2.2 4x2 MT is the cheapest
Engine Size
2.2 L
2.0 L
2,198 cc
1,996 cc
4
4
16
16
6-Speed Manual
6-speed manual
Mazda BT-50 2.2 4x2 MT has a bigger engine
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo XL+ 4x4 MT is more powerful
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo XL+ 4x4 MT has more pulling power />
Diesel
Diesel
n/a
Euro 4
80 L
80 L
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo XL+ 4x4 MT is more fuel efficient
*brand manufacturer claim
5,365 mm
5,350 mm
1,850 mm
1,918 mm
1,821 mm
1,884 mm
3,220 mm
3,270 mm
1,549 mm
1,564 mm
1,560 mm
1,584 mm
513 mm
540 mm
n/a
985 kg
24 m
13 m
237 mm
235 mm
4
4
5
5
Mazda BT-50 2.2 4x2 MT is longer
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo XL+ 4x4 MT is wider
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo XL+ 4x4 MT is taller
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo XL+ 4x4 MT has a large wheelbase
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo XL+ 4x4 MT has a longer deck
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo XL+ 4x4 MT has a wider deck
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo XL+ 4x4 MT has a taller deck
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo XL+ 4x4 MT has a larger payload capacity
Ford Ranger 2.0 Turbo XL+ 4x4 MT has a tighter turning circle
1
1
1
1
2
2
with Electronic Brake Force Distribution, Brake Assist, and Dynamic Stability Control
With Electronic Brake Force Distribution
17 in
16 in
Electronic Automatic Dual Zone
Single-Zone Manual Air Temperature Control
Multifunction Display with USB, Aux-in, and Bluetooth Voice Control via 6 speakers
10" Colored Portrait Touchscreen
3 Years (100,000 km)
5 Years (150,000 km)
n/a
n/a
Important: AutoDeal.com.ph aims to provide the most accurate and updated vehicle information as possible. However, please note that vehicle specifications, prices, and images may be changed by the manufacturers and dealerships without prior notice. If you spot a potential mistake, feel free to contact us at info@autodeal.com.ph.