Autodeal Car Comparison
Mazda BT-50 3.0L AT 4x2 vs. Ford Ranger 2.2 Wildtrak 4X2 AT
Ford Ranger 2.2 Wildtrak 4X2 AT is the cheapest
Engine Size
3.0 L
2.2 L
2,999 cc
2,198 cc
4
4
16
16
6-Speed Automatic
6-speed Automatic
Mazda BT-50 3.0L AT 4x2 has a bigger engine
Mazda BT-50 3.0L AT 4x2 is more powerful
Mazda BT-50 3.0L AT 4x2 has more pulling power />
Mazda BT-50 3.0L AT 4x2 accelerates more quickly
Diesel
Diesel
Euro 4
n/a
76 L
80 L
Mazda BT-50 3.0L AT 4x2 is more eco-friendly
Mazda BT-50 3.0L AT 4x2 is more fuel efficient
*brand manufacturer claim
5,280 mm
5,354 mm
1,870 mm
2,163 mm
1,785 mm
1,848 mm
3,125 mm
3,220 mm
1,571 mm
n/a
1,530 mm
n/a
490 mm
n/a
800 kg
1,120 kg
13 m
n/a
235 mm
237 mm
4
4
5
5
Ford Ranger 2.2 Wildtrak 4X2 AT is longer
Ford Ranger 2.2 Wildtrak 4X2 AT is wider
Ford Ranger 2.2 Wildtrak 4X2 AT is taller
Ford Ranger 2.2 Wildtrak 4X2 AT has a large wheelbase
Mazda BT-50 3.0L AT 4x2 has a longer deck
Mazda BT-50 3.0L AT 4x2 has a wider deck
Mazda BT-50 3.0L AT 4x2 has a taller deck
Ford Ranger 2.2 Wildtrak 4X2 AT has a larger payload capacity
Mazda BT-50 3.0L AT 4x2 has a tighter turning circle
1
1
1
1
2
2
17 in
18 in
Single-Zone, Manual with Rear Vents
Dual-zone EATC
7.0-inch LCD Touchscreen with 6 Speakers
8-inch Multi-function TFT Touch Screen Display, AM/FM/CD and SYNC 3 via 6 speakers
3 Years or 100,000 km + 5 Years Free Service Plan
3 Years (100,000 km)
n/a
n/a
Important: AutoDeal.com.ph aims to provide the most accurate and updated vehicle information as possible. However, please note that vehicle specifications, prices, and images may be changed by the manufacturers and dealerships without prior notice. If you spot a potential mistake, feel free to contact us at info@autodeal.com.ph.