Autodeal Car Comparison
Mazda BT-50 3.2 4x4 AT vs. Ford Ranger 2.2 Wildtrak 4X4 AT
Ford Ranger 2.2 Wildtrak 4X4 AT is the cheapest
Engine Size
3.2 L
2.2 L
3,198 cc
2,198 cc
5
4
20
16
6-Speed Automatic
6-speed Automatic
Mazda BT-50 3.2 4x4 AT has a bigger engine
Mazda BT-50 3.2 4x4 AT is more powerful
Mazda BT-50 3.2 4x4 AT has more pulling power />
Diesel
Diesel
n/a
n/a
80 L
80 L
Mazda BT-50 3.2 4x4 AT is more fuel efficient
*brand manufacturer claim
5,365 mm
5,354 mm
1,850 mm
2,163 mm
1,821 mm
1,848 mm
3,220 mm
3,220 mm
1,549 mm
1,540 mm
1,560 mm
1,560 mm
513 mm
511 mm
n/a
1,120 kg
24 m
n/a
237 mm
237 mm
4
4
5
5
Mazda BT-50 3.2 4x4 AT is longer
Ford Ranger 2.2 Wildtrak 4X4 AT is wider
Ford Ranger 2.2 Wildtrak 4X4 AT is taller
Mazda BT-50 3.2 4x4 AT and Ford Ranger 2.2 Wildtrak 4X4 AT have the same wheelbases
Mazda BT-50 3.2 4x4 AT has a longer deck
Mazda BT-50 3.2 4x4 AT and Ford Ranger 2.2 Wildtrak 4X4 AT have the same deck widths
Mazda BT-50 3.2 4x4 AT has a taller deck
Ford Ranger 2.2 Wildtrak 4X4 AT has a larger payload capacity
Mazda BT-50 3.2 4x4 AT has a tighter turning circle
1
1
1
1
2
2
with Electronic Brake Force Distribution, Brake Assist, and Dynamic Stability Control, and Hill Descent Control
With Electronic Brake Force Distribution
17 in
18 in
Electronic Automatic Dual Zone
Dual-zone EATC
Multifunction Display with USB, Aux-in, and Bluetooth Voice Control via 6 speakers
8-inch Multi-function TFT Touch Screen Display, AM/FM/CD and SYNC 3 via 6 speakers
3 Years (100,000 km)
3 Years (100,000 km)
n/a
n/a
Important: AutoDeal.com.ph aims to provide the most accurate and updated vehicle information as possible. However, please note that vehicle specifications, prices, and images may be changed by the manufacturers and dealerships without prior notice. If you spot a potential mistake, feel free to contact us at info@autodeal.com.ph.