Autodeal Car Comparison
Mazda BT-50 3.0L AT 4x2 vs. Ford Ranger Raptor 2.0 Bi-Turbo 4x4 AT
Mazda BT-50 3.0L AT 4x2 is the cheapest
Engine Size
3.0 L
2.0 L
2,999 cc
1,996 cc
4
4
16
16
6-Speed Automatic w/Manual Mode
4x4 10-Speed Automatic Transmission with E-shifter
Mazda BT-50 3.0L AT 4x2 has a bigger engine
Ford Ranger Raptor 2.0 Bi-Turbo 4x4 AT is more powerful
Ford Ranger Raptor 2.0 Bi-Turbo 4x4 AT has more pulling power />
Mazda BT-50 3.0L AT 4x2 accelerates more quickly
Diesel
Diesel
Euro 4
Euro 4
76 L
80 L
Mazda BT-50 3.0L AT 4x2 is more eco-friendly
Mazda BT-50 3.0L AT 4x2 is more fuel efficient
*brand manufacturer claim
*Autodeal Review
5,280 mm
5,381 mm
1,870 mm
2,028 mm
1,785 mm
1,922 mm
3,125 mm
3,270 mm
1,571 mm
1,420 mm
1,530 mm
1,564 mm
490 mm
540 mm
800 kg
652 kg
13 m
13 m
235 mm
272 mm
4
4
5
5
Ford Ranger Raptor 2.0 Bi-Turbo 4x4 AT is longer
Ford Ranger Raptor 2.0 Bi-Turbo 4x4 AT is wider
Ford Ranger Raptor 2.0 Bi-Turbo 4x4 AT is taller
Ford Ranger Raptor 2.0 Bi-Turbo 4x4 AT has a large wheelbase
Mazda BT-50 3.0L AT 4x2 has a longer deck
Ford Ranger Raptor 2.0 Bi-Turbo 4x4 AT has a wider deck
Ford Ranger Raptor 2.0 Bi-Turbo 4x4 AT has a taller deck
Mazda BT-50 3.0L AT 4x2 has a larger payload capacity
Mazda BT-50 3.0L AT 4x2 has a tighter turning circle
1
1
1
1
2
2
1
17 in
17 in
Single-Zone Manual
Dual-Zone Electronic Automatic Temperature Control Air-Conditioning
8.0-inch LCD Touchscreen with 6 Speakers
12-inch Colored Portrait Touchscreen Central Display via 6-speakers
3 Years or 100,000 km + 5 Years Free Service Plan
5 Years (150,000 km)
n/a
Rock crawl, Sand, Mud/Ruts, and Baja
Important: AutoDeal.com.ph aims to provide the most accurate and updated vehicle information as possible. However, please note that vehicle specifications, prices, and images may be changed by the manufacturers and dealerships without prior notice. If you spot a potential mistake, feel free to contact us at info@autodeal.com.ph.