Autodeal Car Comparison
Mazda CX-5 2.0 FWD Pro vs. Isuzu mu-X 3.0 LS-E 4x4 AT
Mazda CX-5 2.0 FWD Pro is the cheapest
Engine Size
2.0 L
3.0 L
1,998 cc
2,999 cc
4
4
16
16
SKYACTIV-DRIVE 6-speed Automatic
6-speed Automatic transmission w/ Sequential shift
Isuzu mu-X 3.0 LS-E 4x4 AT has a bigger engine
Is the Isuzu mu-X worth it?
It may not be the most powerful or come with the most tech, but it does come with its own appeal.
Isuzu mu-X 3.0 LS-E 4x4 AT is more powerful
Isuzu mu-X 3.0 LS-E 4x4 AT has more pulling power />
Isuzu mu-X 3.0 LS-E 4x4 AT accelerates more quickly
Gasoline
Diesel
n/a
Euro 4
56 L
80 L
Isuzu mu-X 3.0 LS-E 4x4 AT is more fuel efficient
*brand manufacturer claim
4,550 mm
4,850 mm
1,840 mm
1,870 mm
1,675 mm
1,825 mm
2,700 mm
2,855 mm
11 m
11 m
185 mm
235 mm
471 L
275 L
5
5
5
7
Isuzu mu-X 3.0 LS-E 4x4 AT is longer
Isuzu mu-X 3.0 LS-E 4x4 AT is wider
Isuzu mu-X 3.0 LS-E 4x4 AT is taller
Isuzu mu-X 3.0 LS-E 4x4 AT has a large wheelbase
Mazda CX-5 2.0 FWD Pro has a tighter turning circle
Mazda CX-5 2.0 FWD Pro has a larger trunk capacity
1
1
1
1
2
2
2
2
1
17 in
20 in
Electronic Automatic Temperature Control
Dual Zone Auto Climate Control with Pollen Filter
7-inch Touchscreen LCD monitor, MP3, Aux-in, Two-USB and Bluetooth Function via 6 speakers
10.1-inch full touchscreen display
3 Years (100,000 km)
3 Years or 100,000 km
n/a
Terrain Command Select Dial with Rough Terrain Mode Switch
Important: AutoDeal.com.ph aims to provide the most accurate and updated vehicle information as possible. However, please note that vehicle specifications, prices, and images may be changed by the manufacturers and dealerships without prior notice. If you spot a potential mistake, feel free to contact us at info@autodeal.com.ph.